The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) is working on a tiered licensing framework for fintech companies, a move aimed at tightening oversight and reducing risks in the fast-growing digital lending sector.
The proposal comes as digital credit apps and fintech platforms see rapid growth across India. While these platforms have improved access to credit, regulators have raised concerns about fraud, misuse of data, and unregulated lending practices. The new approach is expected to create a structured licensing system that brings fintech players under clearer supervision.
Why the RBI Is Considering a New Licensing Model
India’s fintech sector has expanded quickly over the past few years. Digital lending apps, buy-now-pay-later platforms, and embedded finance solutions have become common, especially among young and urban users.
However, regulators have flagged several risks. These include data misuse, aggressive recovery practices, and unregulated apps offering loans without proper authorisation. Past regulatory reviews and studies have highlighted issues such as predatory lending, privacy violations, and opaque loan terms.
In many cases, fintech firms operate as technology providers while the actual loans are issued by banks or non-banking financial companies. This has created a situation where some fintechs are not directly regulated by the RBI, even though they play a key role in the lending process. The proposed tiered licensing system aims to close this regulatory gap.
What the Tiered Licensing Framework Could Look Like
Under the proposed model, fintech companies could be placed into different regulatory tiers based on their size, business model, and risk profile.
Instead of a single licensing approach, the RBI may create multiple categories. Each tier would have its own compliance rules, capital requirements, and supervision standards.
Smaller or low-risk fintech firms may face lighter compliance obligations. Larger platforms that handle credit, customer data, or payments at scale could be subject to stricter oversight.
This structure is expected to bring currently unregulated fintech players under direct RBI supervision, reduce risks linked to fraud and money laundering, improve consumer protection, and create a clearer path for fintechs to grow into licensed financial institutions.
Shift From Indirect to Direct Regulation
Until now, many fintech lending platforms have been regulated indirectly.
Under existing rules, the RBI supervises banks and NBFCs that fund the loans, while fintech apps operate as service providers. This arrangement allows the central bank to extend rules through partnerships with regulated entities.
However, the rapid rise of digital credit has exposed the limits of this model. Regulators have found that some fintech apps were operating without clear accountability, especially in cases involving data misuse or unfair recovery practices.
A tiered licensing system would allow the RBI to supervise fintechs directly, rather than relying only on partner banks or NBFCs.
Link to RBI’s Digital Lending Guidelines
The proposed licensing structure is part of a broader regulatory push in digital lending.
Over the past few years, the RBI has introduced several guidelines to improve transparency and borrower protection. These include rules on explicit user consent for data collection, clear disclosure of loan terms, restrictions on third-party access to funds, and data storage requirements.
The digital lending directions issued in recent years have focused on borrower protection, platform accountability, and end-to-end transparency. The new licensing proposal is expected to complement these rules by creating a formal regulatory structure for fintech companies themselves.
Impact on Fintech Startups and Neobanks
The tiered licensing approach could reshape the fintech landscape in India.
Some fintech startups have been seeking direct licences to offer financial services, rather than operating through partner banks. Policy discussions in recent years have also considered phased or two-tier licensing models for fintechs and neobanks.
Under a tiered structure, early-stage fintechs could operate with limited permissions, mid-stage players could receive specialised licences, and large fintechs could transition into fully regulated financial entities. This would give startups a clear regulatory path as they grow.
Benefits for Consumers and the Financial System
The RBI’s move is expected to strengthen consumer protection.
Digital lending has helped millions of users access credit quickly, but it has also led to complaints about hidden charges, harassment, and misuse of personal data.
A structured licensing regime could ensure only authorised apps operate in the market, improve transparency in loan pricing, strengthen grievance redress systems, and reduce fraud and data misuse. It may also improve confidence in digital lending platforms, which is crucial for the long-term growth of the sector.
Industry Concerns and Compliance Costs
While the proposal aims to improve safety, it may also increase compliance costs for fintech firms.
Smaller startups could face higher capital requirements, more reporting obligations, and stricter technology and data standards.
However, the tiered structure is designed to prevent excessive burden on early-stage companies by matching regulations with their size and risk level.
Global Trend Toward Fintech Licensing
India is not alone in moving toward tighter fintech oversight.
Across the world, regulators are introducing licensing regimes for digital lenders and fintech platforms. This is mainly due to the rapid growth of digital credit, the use of alternative data for loan decisions, the rise of buy-now-pay-later services, and concerns about consumer protection.
Global studies have also pointed out risks linked to digital lenders, including data mining, cross-platform activities, and gaps in regulatory coverage. India’s proposed tiered model aligns with these global trends.
What Happens Next
The RBI is expected to release discussion papers or draft rules before finalising the framework.
Typically, such proposals go through a discussion paper inviting public comments, followed by draft regulations with detailed rules, and final guidelines after industry feedback. This process allows banks, fintech firms, and consumer groups to share their views.
Outlook: A Turning Point for India’s Fintech Sector
The tiered licensing proposal could mark a major shift in how fintech companies operate in India.
Instead of relying mainly on partnerships with banks or NBFCs, fintechs may soon need direct regulatory approval based on their scale and risk. This could lead to a more structured and transparent digital lending ecosystem.
At the same time, the framework may open the door for mature fintechs to become fully licensed financial institutions over time.
Bottom Line
The RBI’s plan for tiered fintech licensing is aimed at balancing innovation with safety in India’s digital lending market.
By bringing fintech platforms under clearer regulatory oversight, the central bank hopes to reduce risks, protect borrowers, and build long-term trust in digital finance.
For fintech startups, the proposal could mean stricter rules but also a clearer path to scale within a regulated financial system. For consumers, it could lead to safer and more transparent digital lending options in the years ahead.
If implemented, the framework could become one of the most important regulatory changes shaping India’s fintech sector in the coming decade.
Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is intended for general informational purposes only. While every effort is made to ensure accuracy, completeness, and timeliness, data such as prices, market figures, government notifications, weather updates, holiday announcements, and public advisories are subject to change and may vary based on location and official revisions. Readers are strongly encouraged to verify details from relevant official sources before making financial, investment, career, travel, or personal decisions. This publication does not provide financial, investment, legal, or professional advice and shall not be held liable for any losses, damages, or actions taken in reliance on the information provided.
Last Updated on Monday, February 9, 2026 3:57 pm by Startup Magazine Team
About The Author
